
Leclerc rejects Hadjar’s claim Verstappen would have won Singapore by more in a Ferrari
Archive photograph: Charles Leclerc · 2026-05-13Archive photo · 2026-05-13 · Gabriel Hutchinson · CC BY-SA 4.0
Leclerc says outsiders cannot judge a rival team’s car after Hadjar suggested Verstappen would have won Singapore by a larger margin in a Ferrari.
Charles Leclerc has rejected Isack Hadjar’s suggestion that Max Verstappen would have won the Singapore Grand Prix by a larger margin in a Ferrari. Asked about the idea in Austin, Leclerc called it “nonsense”. Verstappen won by 7.3 seconds over Leclerc, who finished second.
Leclerc said Hadjar could not know what Ferrari’s car was like, just as he himself could not know what kind of car Hadjar drove. The field is tightly matched, he said, making predictions difficult; at such fine margins, optimising a team’s package matters more than expectations about the cars.
Leclerc said Mercedes might be an exception: it had not been as far ahead in recent races as expected. If it unlocks the performance he had in mind, he said, it would be further ahead than any other team. Otherwise, he expected the field to remain very tight.
Sources 01
- SOURCECharles Leclerc slams Isack Hadjar's Max Verstappen Ferrari claim as "nonsense"Motorsport.com F1
This article was produced with AI assistance. Source references make its supporting evidence traceable.
Read also
Hadjar backs Red Bull to fight at the front despite balance concerns
Hadjar: Ferrari, not Red Bull, was fastest in Singapore
Hadjar says Ferrari was fastest in Singapore
Verstappen conquers Singapore as Antonelli takes third and extends points lead
Hadjar vents over Red Bull pace after fifth place in Malaysia

