Verstappen takes Red Bull’s first pole with its own engine

Verstappen topped every qualifying segment and says he is confident in his choices for the race, while Hamilton expects overtaking to be difficult.

GPBeat · Newsroom03 Oct 2026, 13:48 · 1 min

Max Verstappen was fastest in every qualifying segment and took pole position, giving Red Bull its first pole with its own engine, RacingNews365 reported on 3 October. Afterwards, he was asked whether finding that one-lap pace had required compromises that might hurt him in the race.

Verstappen said he was confident in the choices he had made. If others had made bigger sacrifices for qualifying, he added, he wished them luck.

Lewis Hamilton said his team had focused on its own work. He described its long-run pace as acceptable but its car balance as imperfect, and hoped the car would improve for the race. He also expected following another car and overtaking to be difficult.

Verstappen expects the heat to test drivers, cars, brakes and tyres. He said he felt confident so far, but could not predict who would manage those demands best in the race.

Source context

RacingNews365’s report gives conflicting event and venue descriptions, so the race location is not named here.

Claims and supporting evidence 5

RacingNews365 reports that Max Verstappen was fastest in every qualifying segment, took pole position and gave Red Bull its first pole with its own engine.

This source finding must be read within the stated scope and source context. Qualifying result that prompted the remarks Qualifying discussed in the article published on 3 October 2026 This is the outlet's report, not an independently checked timing record. The source's event-name and venue wording is inconsistent.

[1]

Asked whether improving qualifying pace had required sacrifices that might cost him in the race, Verstappen said he was confident in his choices and wished others luck if they had made greater sacrifices. He did not establish that he or his rivals had in fact made those sacrifices.

This source finding must be read within the stated scope and source context. Verstappen's response to a question about qualifying and race setup After the qualifying session discussed on 3 October 2026 RacingNews365 says it was among the outlets to which he spoke. The supplied article contains selected quotations, not a full interview transcript.

[1]

Hamilton said his team had focused on itself, described its long-run pace as acceptable but its balance as imperfect, and expressed hope that the car would be better for the race. He described overtaking and following another car as difficult.

This source finding must be read within the stated scope and source context. Hamilton's assessment before the race After qualifying and before the race discussed in the article These are Hamilton's assessments and expectations as quoted by RacingNews365, not independently established race performance.

[1]

Verstappen predicted a demanding race for drivers, cars, brakes and tyres, said he could not know who would manage those demands best, and said he felt confident so far that weekend. This is a pre-race view, not an observed race outcome.

This source finding must be read within the stated scope and source context. Verstappen's race outlook After qualifying and before the race discussed in the article The article provides selected remarks; neither the predicted conditions nor the eventual race result is established by them.

[1]

The supplied report is credited to Pepijn van der Hulst at RacingNews365. As no other publication was retrieved, there are no supported agreements, differing emphases or contradictions between named media to report.

This source finding must be read within the stated scope and source context. Source provenance and cross-publication comparison Article supplied with a 3 October 2026 publication timestamp The page displays 'Vandaag' rather than an absolute publication date; the date is supplied in the post metadata. The absence of another retrieved publication is a limit of the supplied archive.

[1]

This article was produced with AI assistance. Source references make its supporting evidence traceable.